![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
Does assisted death in OR allow for immediate $1K aldehyde bath?
Will O.C. be embracinig & offering ASC ???
Thanks in advance.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Thanks for response.jordansparks wrote: a. Since the scan would be destructive
b. If you scan too early, the risk would be that you wouldn't do a high enough quality scan.
c. Why not wait...?
d. One reason they might not feel full continuation is because of some level of amnesia from damage done during the dying and preservation process.
e. This is simply our least-worst option.
The winner in my estimate would be the answer where the group of 1,000 attracts the most organic interest from the next 1,000 scientists, without a need for dragging them on their hairs to come and work in this field.Which of these do you think aids antigravity R&D towards eventual fully functional antigravity the quickest?
.- 1,000 scientists working full time on improving and promoting antigravity science; or
.- 1,000 scientists working full time on improving and promoting aerospace engineering